Search Noah

 

Applications

Contact Us

 

 

 

Customer Testimonial

Process Impact Evaluation of the Noah Precision Point-of-Use™ (POU) Thermoelectric Chiller on a Lam 2300 Versys™ Chamber

 

Main Focus:

 

Recently a Noah Model 3500 Point-Of-Use™ chiller was installed on a Lam 2300 Versys™ chamber for a temperature and CD repeatability evaluation. A Noah point-of-use chiller is located very close to the etch chamber and it operates with a small volume of dielectric fluid. Combined with its dynamic control architecture it responds immediately to changes in heat load, providing temperature control that can maintain set-point within a much tighter tolerance. We evaluated the temperature repeatability of our Poly Gate etch chamber with the point-of-use chiller vs. an identical chamber with a traditional compressor-based reservoir type chiller. We measured temperature repeatability with the OnWAFER device and CD repeatability with Known Good Wafers (KGW) from the Poly Gate etch.

 

Results Achieved:

 

The evaluation was begun by running an OnWafer four times in a row. The data is given below along with the reservoir chiller data for comparison.

 

Lam 2300

with POU Chiller

Run 1

Temp. = 78.7 °C

Run 2

Temp. = 78.9 °C

Run 3

Temp. = 78.9 °C

Run 4

Temp. = 78.9 °C

Delta = 0.2 °C

Lam 2300

with Reservoir (static) Chiller

Run 1

Temp. = 80.9 °C

Run 2

Temp. = 81.0 °C

Run 3

Temp. = 79.8 °C

Run 4

Temp. = 78.8 °C

Delta = 2.2°C

 

We can see from this test the POU chiller has much better temperature repeatability than the reservoir chiller. It is interesting how both chillers end up in the same place over time. The POU chiller is stable from the start, while the reservoir chiller ramps up then down. Next, CD variation was measured across a lot for both cases. The Known Good Wafers from the Poly Gate etch were used for these tests. The results are shown below.

 

Lam 2300

with POU Chiller
Wafer Slot CD's

1

0.1371

3

0.1372

5

0.1366

7

0.1386

15

0.1393

20

0.1396

25

0.1396

Variation:

0.0030

Lam 2300

with Reservoir (static) Chiller
Wafer Slot CD's

1

0.1468

5

0.1417

10

0.1481

15

0.1463

20

0.1452

25

0.1450

Variation:

0.0064

 

We can see that the variation in the POU chiller case is much less, with only 3nm variation vs. a 6nm variation with the conventional chiller. Graphs of this data are shown below.

 

 

 

Again, these graphs show the POU chiller to be much more stable than the reservoir chiller. To check the stability of the POU chiller over time another across wafer CD tests was run a week after the first one. That data is shown below.

 

 

Second POU chiller across wafer CD test:

Wafer Slot CD's

1

0.1386

5

0.1380

10

0.1380

15

0.1382

20

0.1374

25

0.1391

Variation:

0.0017

Again much lower variation in the POU case, But what is really striking is the CD repeatability lot to lot. The average for the first lot was .13822µm, the average for the second lot is .13823µm. Nice repeatability.

 

Conclusion

 

The Noah Point-of-Use™ thermoelectric chiller has demonstrated a significant improvement in CD Bias control. There is considerable benefit to be realized by implementation in the production environment for processes that are temperature sensitive, similar to the Poly gate etch tested in this evaluation.
 
Offering a Complete Range of Thermoelectric Temperature
Control Systems, Including Dynamic Point-of-Use Chillers
for Semiconductor Wafer Processing Equipment.
Copyright © 2007 Noah Precision, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
 
All other trademarks are the property
of the respective trademark owners.
® and ™ denote United States trademarks.